Light Functional Interpretation - an optimization of Gödel’s technique towards the extraction of (more) efficient programs from (classical) proofs
نویسنده
چکیده
We give a Natural Deduction formulation of an adaptation of Gödel’s functional (Dialectica) interpretation to the extraction of (more) efficient programs from (classical) proofs. We adapt Jørgensen’s formulation of pure Dialectica translation by eliminating his “Contraction Lemma” and allowing free variables in the extracted terms (which is more suitable in a Natural Deduction setting). We also adapt Berger’s uniform existential and universal quantifiers to the Dialectica-extraction context. The use of such quantifiers without computational meaning permits the identification and isolation of contraction formulas which would otherwise be redundantly included in the pure-Dialectica extracted terms. In the end we sketch the possible combination of our refinement of Gödel’s Dialectica interpretation with its adaptation to the extraction of bounds due to Kohlenbach into a light monotone functional interpretation.
منابع مشابه
Light Functional Interpretation - an optimization of Gödel ’ s technique towards the extraction of ( more ) efficient programs from ( classical ) proofs - Technical Appendix
We give a Natural Deduction formulation of an adaptation of Gödel’s functional (Dialectica) interpretation to the extraction of (more) efficient programs from (classical) proofs. We adapt Jørgensen’s formulation of pure Dialectica translation by eliminating his “Contraction Lemma” and allowing free variables in the extracted terms (which is more suitable in a Natural Deduction setting). We also...
متن کاملAnalysis of methods for extraction of programs from non-constructive proofs
Proofs in constructive logic correspond to functional programs in a direct and natural way. Computational content can also be found in proofs which use non-constructive principles, but more advanced techniques are required to interpret such proofs. Various methods have been developed to harvest programs from derivations in classical logic and experiments have yielded surprising and counterintui...
متن کاملUnderstanding and Using Spector's Bar Recursive Interpretation of Classical Analysis
This note reexamines Spector’s remarkable computational interpretation of full classical analysis. Spector’s interpretation makes use of a rather abstruse recursion schema, so-called bar recursion, used to interpret the double negation shift DNS. In this note bar recursion is presented as a generalisation of a simpler primitive recursive functional needed for the interpretation of a finite (int...
متن کاملA Trust-region Method using Extended Nonmonotone Technique for Unconstrained Optimization
In this paper, we present a nonmonotone trust-region algorithm for unconstrained optimization. We first introduce a variant of the nonmonotone strategy proposed by Ahookhosh and Amini cite{AhA 01} and incorporate it into the trust-region framework to construct a more efficient approach. Our new nonmonotone strategy combines the current function value with the maximum function values in some pri...
متن کاملOn the pointfree counterpart of the local definition of classical continuous maps
The familiar classical result that a continuous map from a space $X$ to a space $Y$ can be defined by giving continuous maps $varphi_U: U to Y$ on each member $U$ of an open cover ${mathfrak C}$ of $X$ such that $varphi_Umid U cap V = varphi_V mid U cap V$ for all $U,V in {mathfrak C}$ was recently shown to have an exact analogue in pointfree topology, and the same was done for the familiar cla...
متن کامل